The role of introspection in research and historical explanations
Keywords:
Theoretical Review, criticism, historical explanation, researcher, source, hypothesis and problemAbstract
In historical research, the primary responsibility of the researcher is to scrutinize, analyze, critique, and assess documents; this process enables the researcher to establish credibility and confidently elucidate historical facts. To assess the veracity and validity of documents and historical events, commence with this discourse: Is the document pertinent to the event or not? Is there a risk that it is counterfeit? The researcher must juxtapose the document with additional papers and historical evidence. This strategy enables the researcher to comprehend historical information. This research aims to elucidate the significance of in-depth observation in historical inquiry and analysis. This research demonstrates that in elucidating historical facts and utilizing them as evidence of previous occurrences, the significance of comprehensive analysis and data evaluation is paramount. This strategy facilitates a deeper comprehension of historical events and enhances the understanding of contemporary occurrences. Historical study enhances comprehension by examining material pertaining to habits, cultures, traditions, and prior practices.
Downloads
References
Ansari, S. (2023). Philosophy of history. Mazar-e-Sharif: Margez Taghiyati Qalam.
Delavar, A. (1996). Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences. Tehran: Roshd.
Etamadi, F. (1996). The basics of history. Encyclopedia of Literature and Human Sciences.
Farmeli, M. (1991). Basic materials and concepts in the research process.
Farrokhzad, P. (2006). Guide to historical research. Tehran: Golshan.
Hafeznia, M. (2007). An introduction to research methods in humanities. Tehran: Side.
Hegel, W. (2012). Reason in history. (Dr. Hamid Inayat, Trans.) Tehran: Shafi'i.
Hervi, J. (2008). Research method and scientific research in history. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Khel, P. (1994). (1994). Use and abuse of history. (Hasan Kam Shad, Trans.) Tehran: Sahab.
Makala, W. N. (2009). Foundations of history. (Ahmed Golmohammadi, Trans.) Tehran: Ney.
Molai tovani, A. (2023). An introduction to the research method in history.
Nadri, E. S. (2007). Research methods in humanities. Tehran: Badr.
Peretti, Z. (1997). Research method in anthropology. (Mohsen Talasi, Trans.) Tehran: Scientific.
Qaramelki, F. (2005). Principles and techniques of research in the field of religious studies. Qom: Management Center of Qom Theological Field.
Sarukhani, B. (2002). Research methods in social sciences. Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Stanford, M. (2004). An introduction to the philosophy of history. (Ahmed Gul-Mohammadi, Trans.) Tehran: Ney.
Vozri, A. (2001). Philosophy of history, methodology and historiography. Tehran: New design.
Published on: 04-11-2024
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hafizullah Rasuly, Hashmatullah Omid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
