Download the Article:


  • Jovelyn Maglangit Cantina Department of English, College of Arts and Sciences, Jose Rizal Memorial State University
  • Prescilla Lacaya Alvarico Department of Social Science, College of Arts and Sciences, Jose Rizal Memorial State University


gender variation, language variation, viral YouTube videos, comments, social media


This study aims at analyzing the language variations between female and male comments on YouTube viral videos as to abbreviations, emojis, laughter variants, and spelling variants of personal pronouns, utilizing a mixed-method design. This study revealed that males tend to use abbreviations in their comments in the leisure domain. Females used more abbreviations in the information and knowledge domains and emojis in the two domains. The female users used hahahehe, and jaja more frequently than male users in the leisure domain. Male and female users used the laughter variant more often in the leisure domain than in the information and knowledge domain. Women preferred to write the standard spelling of the personal pronouns 'I' and 'you.' Moreover, both men and women used abbreviations to express their views immediately to speed up the typing of messages. Women were more familiar with positive and negative emojis than men. Language varies according to YouTube users' preferences in using the language when posting comments online, and the core social attributes influencing language use are social class, social networks, sex and gender, ethnicity, and age. Thus, infographic material with meanings and examples can be distributed to students and teachers.


Download data is not yet available.


Andy and Dave [surnames unknown] (2009). „Ten YouTube Comments Translated into Standard English‟. DelSquacho. 15 March 2009

Ammari, C. (2019) Gender variation and social media: a sociolinguistic study of selected jordanian facebook posts.

Atanasova, A (2016, November 6). Gender-specific behaviors on social media and what they mean for online communications. Social Media Today.

Axtman, Kriss (2002). „”r u online?”: The Evolving Lexicon of Wired Teens‟. The Christian Science Monitor. 3 March 2009

Berens, Brad (2006). „What the Comments on YouTube Really Mean‟. Mediavorous. 2 April 2009

Butterworth, S.E., Giuliano,T.A., White,J., Cantu,L., and Fraser,K.C. (2019). Sender gender influences emoji interpretation in text messages. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), p. 784. DOI:

Chambers, J.K. (2017). Sociolinguistic heory. DOI:

Coulmas, F. (2013) Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI:

Cox, J. (9 December 2015). "YouTube is making it easier to find viral videos". The Verge. Retrieved October 20, 2020.

Crystal, David (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed ). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI:

Debaron, D. (2011, February 27) Cyber-laugh: everything old is new again, haha. The Web of Language.

Drevitch, G. (2020, February, 29). Women have greater knowledge of emojis than men do. New study offers insights into how emoji use differs between men and women.

Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.

Flesch, M. (2016) Acronyms and Emoticons on a Popular Web Forum: Does Gender Makes a Difference? A Corpus-Based Study of Reddit. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2016. ffhal-02317528f.

Furtina, D., Fata, I.A., and Fitrisia, D. (2016). Grammatical errors in writing task: males vs. females . Proceedings of the First Reciprocal Graduate Research Symposium between University Pendidikan Sultan Idris and Syiah Kuala University, February 26-28, 2016, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.

Hernandez, E., Hepper, K., Porter, J., Schwartzman, G., Shen, X., and Wu, Y., (2016). Emoji and gender. Online. Available at:

Jiang, H. and Ma, J. (2020). Genre-based emoji usage analysis and prediction in video comments. DOI:

Joshi PD, Wakslak CJ, Appel G, Huang L (2020) Gender differences in communicative abstraction. J Pers Soc Psychol 118 (3): 417–435. pmid:31613120 DOI:

Langacker, R. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.

Markowitz DM (2019) Putting your best pet forward: Language patterns of persuasion in online pet advertisements. J Appl Soc Psychol 19: 160–173. DOI:

Meier T, Boyd RL, Mehl MR, Milek A, Pennebaker JW et al. (2020) (Not) lost in translation: Psychological adaptation occurs during speech translation. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 3. DOI:

Moss, G.A. and Gunn, R.W. (2009), Gender differences in website production and preference aesthetics: Preliminary implications for ICT in education and beyond. DOI:

Nishimura, Y. (2015). A sociolinguistic analysis of emoticon usage in Japanese blogs: Variation by age, gender, and topic. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 5.

Nordquist, R. (2019). Definition and Examples of Acrolects in Language.,by%20the%20least%20educated%20people

Park, J., Barash, V., Fink, C., & Cha, M. (2013). Emoticon Style: Interpreting Differences in Emoticons Across Cultures. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.

Park G, Yaden DB, Schwartz HA, Kern ML, Eichstaedt JC et al. (2016) Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook. PLoS One 11 (5): e0155885. pmid:27223607 DOI:

Prada,M., Rodrigues,D.L., Garrido,M.V., Lopes,D., Cavalheiro,B., and Gaspar,R. (2018). Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), pp. 1925–1934. DOI:

Rafi, M. (2010). Sms text analysis: Language. Gender and Current Practices. Available from 20Langu age%20Gender%20and%20Current%20Practice%20_1_.pdf

Recamara, J. (2021). An analysis on the attributed of students’ blog posts. Unpublished Paper. Jose Rizal Memorial State University.

Really Learn English (2010). Language Register. Formal, Informal, and Neutral.

Ripoll, R.M. and Lopez, R.U. (2011) Laughter: gender difference. 211(7):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2010.10.013. DOI:

Sap M, Park G, Eichstaedt J, Kern M, Stillwell D et al. (2014) Developing age and gender predictive lexica over social media. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). pp. 1146–1151. DOI:

Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Dziurzynski L, Ramones SM et al. (2013) Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach. PLoS One 8 (9): e73791. pmid:24086296 DOI:

Skovholt, K., Gronning, A., & Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-)∗. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 19, 780-797. DOI:

Sharma, D. and Rickford, J. (2019). AAVE/Creole copula absence A critique of the imperfect learning hypothesis. Queen Mary University of London / Stanford University. Retrieved on January 30, 2020 from

Shawcroft, Sara R., "Gender differences in text messaging" (2014). Available from

Sheehan, K. (2015). The impact of direct writing conventions instruction on second grade writing mechanics mastery. NSUworks, Anrahan S. Fischler School of Education.

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Derek Denis (2008). „Linguistic Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language‟. American Speech, Vol. 83, No. 1, Spring 2008 [viewed online, original pagination not provided]. American Dialect Society. DOI:

Weder, Mirjam (2008). ‟Form and Function of Metacommunication in CMC‟. In: Kelsey, Sigrid, Kirk St. Amant (eds.). Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication (Vol. 2). Hershey: Information Science Reference, 570-586. DOI:

Wolf, Alecia. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 3. 10.1089/10949310050191809. DOI:

Xia, X. (2013). Gender differences in using language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8). DOI:

Zhenpeng, X., Xuan, W., Wei, H. Huoran, Q., Qiaozhu, X. (2018) Through a gender lens: Learning usage patterns of emojis from large-scale android users. In WWW 2018: The 2018 Web Conference, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. https: // DOI:

Varga, T. (2009). Languageof youtube videos comments. Retrieved on January 29, 2020 from

Published on: 2022-07-27

Also Available On

Note: Third-party indexing sometime takes time. Please wait one week or two for indexing. Validate this article's Schema Markup on

How to Cite

Cantina, J. M., & Alvarico, P. L. (2022). GENDER AND LANGUAGE VARIATION ON THE COMMENTS OF VIRAL YOUTUBE VIDEOS. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(07), 341–359.