The Impact of Knowledge Management Strategies on Organizational Ambidexterity Mediated by Organizational Learning Capability

Downloads

Download the Article:

Authors

  • Assadullah Kazimi Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, Bamyan University, Afghanistan https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4683-5775
  • Seddigheh Khorshid Associate Professor of System Management, Department of Business Management, University of Qom, Qom, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-9166
https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v2i12.168

Keywords:

Knowledge management strategies, Organizational learning capability, Organizational ambidexterity, Tourism

Abstract

Background: This study intends to investigate the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and knowledge management practices, with a focus on travel and tourism industries specifically. The research is conducted using a descriptive-correlation approach and involves 72 businesses located in Qom, Mashhad, and Tehran. A total of 369 managers and personnel from these organizations participated in the study, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of knowledge management and its impact on organizational learning and ambidexterity within the tourism sector. Methods: In this study, descriptive-correlation research methodology was used. Data were collected through a questionnaire distributed to 369 managers and personnel from 72 tourism organizations. The questionnaire focused on assessing the participants' perspectives on knowledge management strategies, organizational learning capability, and organizational ambidexterity. This quantitative approach allowed for the examination of relationships and mediation effects within the specified variables. Findings: The results of the study show substantial correlation between organizational ambidexterity, learning ability, and knowledge management techniques. It was found to be fascinating that the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and knowledge management strategies in the tourism setting was partially mediated by organizational learning capacity. Conclusion: In conclusion, tourism companies should place a high priority on implementing both explicit and tacit knowledge management strategies in order to attain structural ambidexterity. Effective HRM procedures as well as the advancement of knowledge management and information technology infrastructures must serve as the cornerstones of these strategies. Encouraging learning, unlearning, relearning, experimentation, and knowledge sharing are pivotal for enhancing organizational learning capability and, consequently, achieving organizational ambidexterity. This study underscores the need for a holistic approach that integrates human and technological elements to foster a dynamic and adaptable organizational structure in the tourism sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antunes, H. de Jesus G., and Pinheiro. P. G. (2020). Knowledge management, organizational learning and memory, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5 (2) PP. 140-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002

Bock G.-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.-G. and Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp. 87-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669

Brix, J. (2017). Exploring knowledge creation processes as a source of organizational learning: A longitudinal case study of a public innovation project, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33, pp.113–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.05.001

Cepeda, G., and Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 60 (May), pp.426-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.013

Chiva, R., Alegre, J., and Lapiedra, R. (2007). Measuring organizational learning capability among the workforces. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), pp. 224–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755227

Filippini, R., Güttel, W. H., and Nosella, A. (2012). Ambidexterity and the evolution of knowledge management initiatives, Journal of Business research, 65, pp.317–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.003

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382e- 388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313

Fu, L., Zhiying, L., and Suqin, L. (2018). Is distributed leadership a driving factor of innovation ambidexterity? An empirical study with mediating and moderating effects. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), pp. 388-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0134

Gomes, G. a. (2017). Technology Management Organizational learning capability, innovation and performance: study insmall and medium-sized enterprises (SMES), Revista de Administração, . Technology Management 52 , 163–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.003

Gunsel, A., Siachou, E., and Acar, A. Z. (2011). Knowledge Management and Learning Capability to Enhance Organizational Innovativeness, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, pp. 880–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.012

Guo, J., Guo, B., Zhou, J., Wu, X. (2020). How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routines affect firm innovation performance writhen industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attribute, Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Elsevier, 155(C). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119990

Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., and Shalley, C.E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation, Academy Management Journal, 49(4), pp.693-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026

Halawi, L. A. (2006). Knowledge management and the competitive strategy of the firm. The Learning Organization, 13(4) , 384-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470610667751

Hansen, M. T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? . The knowledge management yearbook 2000–2001, 77(2) , 106-116.

Jennex, M. E. (2007). Knowledge management in modern organizations. IGI Global. , Publisher: Idea Group Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-261-9

Kang, S. and Snell, S. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning, Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), pp.65-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x

Khorshid, S. a. (2013). The impact of organizational intelligence on organizational emotional and learning capabilities. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 21 (69) , 25-58.

Koryaka, O. L. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation,. Research Policy, 47 , 413–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003

Kraleva, N. (2011). Learning organizations: Prerequisite for successful tourism organizations.. UTMS Journal of Economics, 2 (1) , 77–82.

Liao, Y.-S. (2011). The effect of human resource management control systems on the relationship between knowledge management strategy and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), , 494-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111158170

Liu, C.-H. (2018). Examining social capital, organizational learning, and knowledge transfer in cultural and creative industries of practice. . Tourism. Management, 64 , 258–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.001

Luxmi, (2014). Organizational Learning Act as a Mediator between the Relationship of Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance, Management and Labour Studies, 39(1), pp. 31–41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X14535158

Malekandathil, P. (Ed.). (2016). The Indian Ocean in the making of Early Modern India. New Delhi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276809

Mihalache, M. a. (2015). Organizational ambidexterity and sustained in the tourism,. Annals of Tourism Research , 142-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.10.011

Nieto-Rodriguez, A. (2014). Ambidexterity inc. Business Strategy Review, 25(3) , 34-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2014.01089.x

Reilly, C. I. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4) , 324-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025

Sengupta, A., and Ray, A. S. (2017). University research and knowledge transfer: A dynamic view of ambidexterity in British universities. Research Policy, 46(5), 881-897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.008

Shih, H.-A. a.-H. (2005). Strategy alignment betweenHRM, KM, and corporatedevelopment, . International Journal of Manpower, 26(6) , 582-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720510625476

Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J. and Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), pp.811-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870144

Sun, J. S. (2019). Roles of dynamic capabilities and knowledge management strategies on organizational performance,. Information Development , 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919894377

Taknet, D. (2016). The Marwari Heritage. Jaipur: IntegralDMS.

Tamayo-Torres, J. R. (2017). Ambidexterity, performance and environmental dynamism. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(3) , 282-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0378

Taylor, A., and Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49, pp. 723-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083029

Úbeda-García, M. C.-C.-L.-S. (2017). Human Resource flexibility and performance in the hotel industry: the role of organizational ambidexterity. Personnel Review, 46 (4) , 824-846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2015-0315

Venkitachalam, K. a. (2012). Tacit Knowledge: Review and Possible Research Directions,. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2) , 357-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211218915

Verona, G., and Ravasi, D. (2003). Unbundling dynamiccapabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (June), pp. 577-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.3.577

Visser, W. (2015). Sustainable frontiers: Unlocking change through business, leadership, and innovation. Greenleaf Publishing.

Wadhvai, C. D. (n.d.). India trying to liberalism, Economic reforms since 1991. 1991 .

Wadhwa, A., and Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.819–835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083132

Wang, J. a. (2012). Understanding accommodation managers’ crisis planning intention: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Tourism Management,33(5) , 1057-1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.12.006

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Coins of the Indain Rupee . Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org

Yigit, M. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration in Organizations. Thesis, Master in Innovation, entrepreneurship and Business Development Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Management.

Yousif Al-Hakim, L. A. (2013). Knowledge management strategies, innovation, and organizational performance, An empirical study of the Iraqi MTS. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 10(1) , 58-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09727981311327767

Published on: 23-12-2023

Also Available On

Note: Third-party indexing sometime takes time. Please wait one week or two for indexing. Validate this article's Schema Markup on Schema.org

How to Cite

Kazimi, A., & Khorshid , S. (2023). The Impact of Knowledge Management Strategies on Organizational Ambidexterity Mediated by Organizational Learning Capability. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(12), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v2i12.168

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Volume 02 Issue 12, Dec 2023

Section

Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Assadullah Kazimi, Seddigheh Khorshid

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.

2583-2387