Unravelling Deconstruction: A Comprehensive Examination of its Qualitative Research Method and Application in Historical Texts

Downloads

Download the Article:

Authors

https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v3i1.210

Keywords:

critical paradigm, historical texts, qualitative, deconstructive

Abstract

This research endeavors to delve into the qualitative research method of deconstruction and its profound application in deciphering the nuanced meanings within historical texts. Utilizing a review methodology, this study takes the form of a comprehensive review article. Deconstruction, as both a theory and practical approach to text reading, challenges the prevailing notion that language systems inherently establish coherence or unity in literary texts, aiming to uncover definitive meanings. The primary objective of deconstruction is to express concepts qualitatively and analytically. Research questions are tailored to the type of text under consideration, guided by the researcher's decisions. For instance, the groundbreaking concept of "explanatory and inquiry" emerged in the literary domain, maintaining its relevance within academic institutions and expanding to encompass various conceptual frameworks. Deconstruction extends its reach into social thinking and speeches, involving critical re-examination of historical texts to glean insights into historical facts. Essentially akin to metaphysical criticism, the deconstruction method was founded by Jacques Derrida, an Algerian philosopher of French origin, whose theories significantly influenced postmodern philosophy and literary criticism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borradori, G. (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago and London. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226066653.001.0001

Creswell, J. V. (2017). 30 Essential Skills that Qualitative Researchers Should Know. Translation: Yazdani, Hamid Reza, Mohammadi, Fatemeh. Tehran: Negha Danesh.

Critchley, S. (1999). The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, 2nd ed. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Derrida, J. (2010). Grammatology. (M. Parsa, Trans.) Tehran: new event.

Derrida, J. (1973). “Difference” in Speech and Phenomena, trans. D.B. Allison. Northwestern University Press.

Evans, J. (1991). Strategies of Deconstruction: Derrida and the Myth of the Voice. USA: University of Minnesota Press.

Gnanasekaran, R. (2015). An Introduction to Derrida, Deconstruction and Post-Structuralism.”. International Journal of English Literature and Culture 3 (7), 211-214.

Hafez Nia, M. R. (2017). An Introduction to Research Methods in Humanities. Twenty-fourth edition. Tehran: Side.

Iman, M. T. (2017). Research philosophy in Social Sciences. First Edition. Golden: Golden.

Khanifar, H. M. (2016). Principles and Basics of Qualitative Research Methods. first volume. Tehran: Negha Danesh.

Mooney, T. (1388). Jacques Derrida; Idealist or Realist? Translation: Parsa, Mehdi. . Tehran: Nood incident.

Nowzari, H. A. (2017). Formulation of Modernity and Postmodernity: Beds of Historical Development and Socio-Social Contexts. Fifth Edition. . Tehran: Naqsh Jahan.

Sadegh, S. (1385). Political Science Methodology. Mofid University.

Shaikh, N. U. (2009). Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. A Comparative Study. Gujarat: Shodhganga.

Staton, F. S. (1987). Deconstructive Analysis. Literary Theories in Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Stocker, B. (2006). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Derrida on Deconstruction. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358115

Published on: 2024-01-01

Also Available On

Note: Third-party indexing sometime takes time. Please wait one week or two for indexing. Validate this article's Schema Markup on Schema.org

How to Cite

Sediq, M. S. (2024). Unravelling Deconstruction: A Comprehensive Examination of its Qualitative Research Method and Application in Historical Texts. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v3i1.210
2583-2387