Protection of Women’s Rights in India Through PIL: An Analysis of The Vishaka Case
Keywords:
Protection of Women’s Rights, PIL, Vishaka Case, CEDAW, Human rightsAbstract
The Indian Supreme Court played a very important role by using Public Interest Litigation for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights to the underprivileged and the marginalized sections of society. The concept of ‘pro bono Público’ litigation was introduced first by Justice Krishna Iyer. It was further elaborated and enforced by Chief Justice P. N. Bhagwati in the judge’s case. In the concept of the protection of women’s rights, the Vishaka judgement delivered by Justice Verma is a landmark pronouncement in which the provision of CEDAW was involved by applying the principle of incorporation. This judgement created the conditions conclusive for the enactment of various laws in India for the promotion of women’s rights in India. This paper seeks to explain the tool of PIL about women’s rights with a detailed account of the Vishaka Case. The study process on the impact and significance of the case and analysis of the present state of women in India despite specific and special constitutional safeguards and statutory provisions and judicial intervention.
Downloads
References
Anuradha K. (n. d.) Judicial Activism in Protection and Promotion of Women in India with special reference to Indian Constitution. Retrieved from https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-116-judicial-activism-in-protection-and-promotion-of-women-in-india-with-special-reference-to-indian-constitution.html
Avani, M. Sood (2008), Gender Justice through Public Interest Litigation: Case Studies from India, 41 Vanderbilt Law Review, 833-906, Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol41/iss3/4
Chadha, A. (2018). Law relating to Sexual harassment of women at the workplace in India: A critical review. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3171264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3171264
Hashim, N. B. (2013). Moves towards Progressive Legal Framework and Energetic Jurisprudential Behavioral on the Enforcement of Public Interest Litigation in the New Millennium. Procedia: Social & Behavioral Sciences, 105, 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.051
Laxmikanth M. (2015). Indian Polity. Mc Graw Hill Education 4th Ed.
Khan, M. W. (2019). Manual Scavenging: A Practice Prohibited, Yet Continues. Asian Resonance. 8(2), 162-168
Rout, N. & Bez, J. (2017). Women’s Rights and Violence in India: A Study of Constitutional Safeguards. Odisha Review. 16(1), 15-29. Retrieved from https://magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2017/Jan/engpdf/15-29.pdf
Samour, A. (n. d.) Women’s Human Rights. Legal Service India E-Journal. Retrieved from https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-8274-women-s-human-rights.html
Settlements, U. C. F. H., & Sweden. (1999). Women’s rights to land, housing and property in post-conflict situations and during reconstruction : a global overview : a research study conducted with the support of the government of Sweden. United Nations Digital Library System. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/432263?ln=en
Vijapur, A. P., (2010). Human Rights in International Relation. Manak Publication PVT. LTD. Pg. 17-18.
Published on: 30-06-2024
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Imteyaz Ahmed, Dr. Fasih Raghib Gauhar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.