Colonial Ambitions and Afghan Sovereignty: Analyzing the First Anglo-Afghan War
Keywords:
political victory, invasion, coalition, alliance, First Anglo-Afghan War, Afghan SovereigntyAbstract
In the 19th century, Russia and the United Kingdom fought one other diplomatically in an attempt to gain more influence in southern Asia. The Russians called it a "shadow tournament," but the British invented the phrase "Great Game." The ascent to prominence of Amir Dost Muhammad Khan was seen by the British as a danger to their interests in India. It was claimed that by using Amir, Russia was intruding on India's borders. Russia's ambitions for regional expansion coincided with the British invasion of Afghanistan. The British redirected their attention to Afghanistan as a result of this development. The British persevered even after they were unable to persuade Amir Dost Muhammad Khan to sign a treaty that would have ended Russian control. Russia continued to communicate with the Amir of Kabul during this time. Consequently, in 1839 the British launched an invasion of Afghanistan, which restored Shah Shuja to his former position. A long-lasting and deadly power battle between the Sadozais and the Barakzais, two sections of the Durrani tribe, took place in Afghanistan in the early 1800s. Dost Mohammad Khan was named the new Emir of Kabul after the Barakzais won the civil war. However, in the midst of the internal strife, Ranjit Singh, the ruler of the Sikh kingdom, took control of Peshawar. This led to a huge and irreversible conflict of interest between Afghanistan and the Sikh state. In addition to identifying the crucial person who made the choice that ultimately sparked hostilities, the essay aims to make clear how these factors interacted and contributed to the start of the conflict. This invasion was a major blow to the British, and it was a turning moment in modern history because it was the first time the Afghans and the British had faced off, which ultimately led to the British's defeat. For its inquiry and study, this article uses a descriptive research approach and technique.
Downloads
References
Farhang, M. M. (2010). Afghanistan in the Last Five Centuries. Kabul: Mewand Khrawandia Society.
Forbes, A. (1892). The Afghan Wars 1839–42 and 1878–80. London: Seeley.
Ghobar, G. H. (2014). Afghanistan Darmsir Tarikh. Peshawar: Peshawar Danesh Publishing Society.
Hanifi, S. M. (2004). Impoverishing a Colonial Frontier: Cash, Credit, and Debt in Nineteenth-Century Afghanistan’, Iranian Studies, Routledge, Vol. 37, No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0021086042000268174
Havelock, C. H. (1840). Narrative of the War in Affghanistan, 2 Vols. London: Henry Colburn.
Hopkirk, P. (1994). The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia, 2nd Ed. New York: Kodansha.
Johnson, R. (2006). Spying for Empire: The Great Game in Central and South Asia, 1757–1947. London: Greenhill.
Lal, M. (1846). Life of the Amir Dost Mohammed Khan of Kabul, 2 Vols. (London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.
Morris, M. (1878). The First Afghan War (London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle and Rivington.
Osmani, A. H. (2019). Contemporary History of Afghanistan. Jalabad: Taqwa Publication Society.
Ryan, B. A. (2010). Brief Biography of Afghan Kings. Siddiqui Publishing House.
Kakakhil, S. B. Z. (2009). Pashtuns in the Light of History. Peshawar: University Book Agency.
Published on: 09-06-2024
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sahib Sadiq Hand
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.