Bismarck’s Foreign Policy from The Formation of The German Empire to the 1878 Congress of Berlin as Reflected in Russian Public Opinion
Keywords:
Bismarck, berlin, congress, unification, hegemonyAbstract
The paper provides an analysis of Bismarck's foreign policy from the establishment of the German Empire in 1871 to the Congress of Berlin in 1878, viewed through the lens of Russian public opinion. Throughout this period, Bismarck aimed to preserve equilibrium in Europe while prioritizing German strategic interests, particularly by thwarting the establishment of an anti-German coalition. The Three Emperors' League, comprising Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia, first presented an image of collaboration; nevertheless, it ultimately demonstrated ineffectiveness throughout the Balkan crises. The Herzegovinian insurrection of 1875 and the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878 revealed significant tensions between Austria-Hungary and Russia, but Germany sought to navigate its alliances without substantial direct engagement. Gradually, Russian public opinion began to regard Germany as a dependable partner and recognized a clear diminishment of Bismarck's influence due to the absence of German support during the Eastern Crisis. The study elucidates the understanding of German policy by Russian publications and political spheres, ultimately concluding that Bismarck prioritized German interests over alliance obligations. In 1878, the Congress of Berlin exacerbated Russian grievances as German diplomacy imposed unfavorable geographical modifications contrary to Russian interests. The data clearly demonstrates the profound fragility of European alliances in the 19th century and the insufficiency of diplomatic agreements to resolve geopolitical conflicts.
Downloads
References
Baluev, B. P. (1971). Politicheskaya reaktsiya .
Bismarck, O. v. (2002). Mysli i vospominaniya.
Evropy, V. (1871). Inostrannoe obozrenie.
Evropy, V. (1875). Korrespondentsiya iz Berlina.
Evropy, V. (1876). nostrannaya politika.
Evropy, V. (1877). “Korrespondentsiya iz Berlina.
Evropy, V. (1878). “Korrespondentsiya iz Berlina.
Golos . (1877).
Golos . (1878).
Golos. (1871). Golos,.
Golos. (1872). Golos.
Golos. (1875). Golos.
Golos. (1876).
Grazhdanin. (1874). Grazhdanin, no. 44 .
Hohenlohe-Schillingsürst. (1907). Chlodwig zu. Denkwürdigkeiten des Fürsten Chlodwig zu Hohenlohe-Schillingsürst .
Katkov, M. N. (1871). Sobranie peredovykh statey Moskovskikh vedomostey za .
Katkov, M. N. (1875). Sobranie peredovykh statey Moskovskikh vedomostey za.
Katkov, M. N. (1876). Sobranie peredovykh statey Moskovskikh vedomostey za .
Katkov, M. N. (1877). Sobranie peredovykh statey Moskovskikh vedomostey za .
M T-ov. (1872). “Vostochnaya politika Germanii i obrusenie.
Nurnberger R. (1991). Russland in der Politik Bismarcks // Preussen-Deutschland und Russland:/ vom 18, bis zum 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin.
Polonsky, L. (1876). “Russkiy vopros na yugo-vostoke Evropy.
Russko-germanskie. (1922). otnisheniya 1873-1914 gg. Dokumenty iz sekretnogo arkhiva 6 Ministerstva innostrannykh .
S.V. Obolenskaya. (1977). Franko-Prusskaya vojna i obschestvennoe mnenie Germanii i Rossii.
Skazkin, S. D. (1974). Konets avstro-russkogo-germanskogo soyuza. Issledovanie po istorii russko-germanskikh i russko-avstriyskikh otnosheniy v svyazi s vostochnym voprosom v 80-e gg. XIX stoletia.
Vestnik Evropy. (1871). Inostrannoe obozrenie T.1 Kn.1.
Published on: 06-03-2025
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alena Eskridge Kosmach

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.