The Different Face of Populism in Armenian Politics: Nikol Pashinyan
Keywords:
Populism, Polarisation, Armenia, Political DiscourseAbstract
Populist leaders have been gaining momentum in countries around the world in recent years, coming to power with great momentum and quickly losing support when their big promises fail to materialize. One of these leaders is Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who discussed a lot with the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh. There are some populist strategy areas in Pashinyan’s policies. His promises of economic reforms and anti-corruption measures resonated with the public but implementing these reforms without causing economic instability has proven challenging. This research argues that his communication style, which often appeals directly to the people and bypasses traditional political channels, is characteristic of populist leaders. This study discusses that his populist rhetoric, particularly regarding Armenia's conflict with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, has exacerbated tensions and hindered diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict. All of these issues are explored with analysing Pashinyan’s political discourse in this article. The main purpose of this article is both to show that Pashinyan's populism is a unique type of populism different from other types of populism and to fill the gap in the literature on populism in Armenian domestic politics.
Downloads
References
Abadjian, V. (2020). Pashinyan's gambit or Armenia's failed revolution. Acta Via Serica, 5 (1), pp. 121-152.
Angelis, R. (2017). Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party: Xenophobic Populism Compared. Policy, Organisation and Society, 16(1), pp. 1-27.
Armenpress. (2018). 4 September. PM weighs in on scandalous statement of Yerevan mayoral candidate Hayk Marutyan. https://armenpress.am/eng/news/945967.htm (Date of Access: 23 May 2021).
Arzumanyan, H. (2019). Velvet revolution in Armenia: Challenges and opportunities. F. Labarre ve G. Niculescu (Ed.). South Caucasus: Leveraging political change in a context of strategic volatility (105-118). Vienna: Republic of Austria/Federal Ministry of Defence.
Atanesyan, A. V. (2018). “Velvet revolution” in Armenia: Potential, gains and risks of political protest activity. Polis. Political Studies, 1 (6), pp. 80-98.
Azatutyun. 2020, 24 March. Tsarukian demands Armenian government’s resignation. https://www.azatutyun.am/a/30656491.html (Date of Access: 6 September 2020).
Bitzer, L. (1981). Political rhetoric. In D. D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders eds, Handbook of political communication: 225-248. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), pp. 27-40.
Chaffee, S. H. ed (1975). Political communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Chilton, P. (1987). Metaphor, euphemism and the militarization of language. Current research on peace and violence, 10(1), pp. 7-19.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 7(2), 177-197.
Finchelstein, F. (2019). From fascism to populism in history. University of California Press.
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the World 2021: Armenia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/armenia/freedom-world/2021
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geis, M. L. (1987). Reporting of Political Speech. The Language of Politics, pp. 78-97.
Gherghina, S., Mişcoiu, S., & Soare, S. (Eds.). (2013). Contemporary populism: a controversial concept and its diverse forms. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Graber, D. A. (1981). Political languages. In: D. D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (eds). Handbook of Political communication: 195-223. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Grigorian, M. (1999). 12 November. Freedom of the press of freedom to harass? Institute for War and Peace Reporting. https://iwpr.net/ (Date of Access: 29 May 2021).
Grigoryan, A. (2019). Populist Politics in Armenia. Caucasus Survey, 7(2), pp. 143-159.
Haberbin. (2020). 19 February. Ermeni Başbakanı iki üst düzey savunma yetkilisini görevden aldı. http://haberbin.com/ermeni-basbakani-iki-ust-duzey-savunma-yetkilisini-gorevden-aldi (Date of Access: 13 June 2021).
Hale, H. E. (2014). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Heinisch, R. K., Cekikj, A., & Koxha, K. (2023). Perspectives on Populism - Diverse Voices from the European "Periphery". Nomos Verlag.
Hovhannisyan, A. (2018). The Armenian Velvet Revolution: Actors and Challenges. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 106, pp. 2-6.
Howarth, D., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance. Springer.
IMF. (2020). Republic of Armenia: 2020 Article IV Consultation—Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Republic of Armenia. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2020/08/07/Republic-of-Armenia-2020-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-Staff-Report-and-Statement-by-49586
Ishkanian, A. (2018). Armenia's unfinished revolution. Current History, 117 (801), pp. 271-276.
Iskandaryan, A. (2018). The velvet revolution in Armenia: How to lose power in two weeks. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 26 (4), pp. 465-482.
Keskin, B. (2020). Populism in Armenia: A Discursive Analysis of the 2018 Velvet Revolution. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 117, 2-6.
Kshetri, N. (2021). Armenia. P. Macmillan (Ed.). The statesman’s yearbook 2021: The politics, cultures and economies of the world (112-115). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lanskoy, M. and Suthers, E. (2019). Armenia's velvet revolution. Journal of Democracy, 30 (2), pp. 85-99.
Miarka, A. (2019). Velvet revolution in Armenia and its influence on state policy: Selected aspects. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 20 (4), pp. 41-50.
Miscoiu, S., and Craciun, O., and Colopelnic, N. (eds.) (2008). Radicalism, Populism, Interventionism. Three Approaches Based on Discourse Theory, Ed. EFES, Cluj-Napoca
Mudde, C. (2019). The far right today. John Wiley & Sons.
Müller, J. W. (2014, 2 December). History’s postscript: The populist threat to liberal democracy. World Politics Review. https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/ 14562/history-s-postscript-the-populist-threat-to-liberal-democracy (Date of Access: 13 July 2021).
Müller, J. W. (2017). What is populism?. Penguin UK.
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. 2020, 24 March. Сoronavirus response should not impede the work of the media in Armenia, says OSCE media freedom representative. https://www.osce.org/representative-on-freedom-of-media/449098 (Date of Access: 30 June 2021).
Ozinian, A. (2020, 8 September). Ermenistan’ın korona sınavı. Agos. https://www.agos.com.tr/tr/yazi/24832/ermenistanin-korona-sinavi (Date of Access: 27 June 2021).
Pashinyan, N. (2019, 16 June). Civic Contract speech. CivilNet. https://www.civilnet.am/news/2019/06/17/ (Date of Access: 11 July 2021).
Pashinyan, N. (2020, 19 April). Pashinyan’s life. Facebook. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twmeYLultBE (Date of Access: 13 July 2021).
Sankofa, N. (2022). Critical method of document analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1-13.
Shirinyan, A. (2018). Karabakh discourses in Armenia following the velvet revolution. Caucasus Edition: Journal of Conflict Transformation, 3 (2), pp. 140-154.
Swanson, D. L., & Nimmo, D. D., eds. (1990). New directions in political communication: a resource book. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2). Sage.
Way, L. A. (2015). "Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics." Journal of Democracy, 13(3), pp. 127-142.
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking. The pragmatic analysis of political language, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wodak, R. and Menz, F., eds (1990). Sprache in der Politik—Politik in der Sprache: Analysen zum Öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. Klagenfurt: Drava.
World Bank. (2020). Armenia: Political Economy Assessment. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/858331593028853226/armenia-political-economy-assessment
Published on: 12-07-2025
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Caglar Ezikoglu, Ali Samir Merdan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
