Economic Statecraft and Strategic Decoupling: Evaluating U.S. and Chinese Use of Tariffs as Foreign Policy Tools
Keywords:
Economic Statecraft, Strategic Decoupling, U.S-China Trade War, Geoeconomics, Tariffs, Chains of Worldwide SupplyAbstract
The present paper would explore tariffs employed by the United States and China to pursue their economic statecrafting as part of strategic decoupling. Based on realism, economic interdependence, and liberal institutionalism theories, the study examines how the two states have used trade policy as a weapon in achieving geopolitical aims especially in the Trump administration to the Biden period. The study will be devoted to Section 231 and 301 tariffs that are applied by the U.S., and counter measures of China that involve sensitive areas including agriculture, rare earth elements and high technology. The choice of case studies and empirical studies outlines how tariffs are used as an instrument of not only economic but also coercive policies, direction of resources back to the home country, and technological onshoring. The results indicate that tariffs have had a mixed level of success in meeting strategic objectives, but have contributed in great ways to breaking global supply chains, eroding the multilateral norms in the trade, and a drift toward bilateral and regional economic affiliations. It also examines the effects of having a strategic decoupling on the current global political economy since it enhances geoeconomic fragmentation and it undermines the usefulness of having the world trade organization. Finally, the paper demands that economic competition must be carried out in a fair and mutually supportive manner that will strengthen the stability of the global environment whilst protecting national interests.
Downloads
References
Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674545960
Bown, C. P. (2020). The WTO and the U.S.-China trade conflict: The role of tariffs and their impact on global supply chains. Journal of International Commerce and Economics, 12(3), 45–67.
Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2019). Going it alone? Trade policy after three years of populism. CEPR Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Pearson.
Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geoeconomics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, (20), 17–23.
Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.
Published on: 19-07-2025
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammed Kabeer Garba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.