Exploring the Dimensions of Religious Freedom: A Global and Comparative Analysis
Keywords:
Religious Freedom, Secularism, individual vs group rights, United NationsAbstract
Religion constitutes a fundamental aspect of the cultural and spiritual lives of individuals globally, encompassing an array of traditions, rituals, and practices. Within the context of liberal democracy's evolution, religion emerges as a critical element of political liberty and personal conscience. On an international scale, the right to religious freedom has been established as a core human right, essential for the sustenance of democratic governance. Despite its recognition, the right to religious liberty remains a highly contentious issue. Even in democracies that provide constitutional protections for religious freedom, debates persist regarding the extensive interpretation and implementation of this right, particularly concerning the rights of religious minorities within these nations. This study explores the concept of religious freedom as a globally recognized right, examining its representation and interpretation across various international and regional legal frameworks. Through this analysis, the paper endeavors to provide a comprehensive overview of religious freedom on both a global and regional scale. Furthermore, it delves into the state of religious freedom in various political systems, ranging from democracies such as United States to theocracies and monarchies like the United Kingdom and countries characterized by a strict demarcation between religion and state affairs, exemplified by France's secularist approach.
Downloads
References
Alfredsson, G. (2015). “Minority Rights and the United Nations.” In The United Nations Declaration on Minorities, Brill Nijhoff, 19–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251564_003
Barber, H. W. (1947). “Religious Liberty v. Police Power: Jehovah’s Witnesses.” American Political Science Review 41(2): 226–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1950708
de Beaufort, Fleur, Ingemund Hägg, and P van Schie. (2008). “Separation of Church and State in Europe.” In With Views on Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Slovenia and Greece, European Liberal Forum, Brüssels,.
Bloed, A. (1991). “A New CSCE Human Rights ‘Catalogue’: The Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE.” In The Human Dimension of the Helsinki Process, Brill Nijhoff, 54–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004482173_007
Brown, C. G. (2019). The Battle for Christian Britain: Sex, Humanists and Secularisation, 1945–1980. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108367592
Çarkoğlu, A., and Bilgili, N. Ç, (2020). “A Precarious Relationship: The Alevi Minority, the Turkish State and the EU.” In Turkey and the EU: Accession and Reform, Routledge, 143–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203721827-11
Cohen, G. (2010). “Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Protected Goods.” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 12(2): 180–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956618X10000050
Danchin, P. (2006). “Between Rogues and Liberals: Towards Value Pluralism as a Theory of Freedom of Religion in International Law.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 100: 414–16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25660136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700024861
Davis, D. H. (2002). “The Evolution of Religious Freedom as a Universal Human Right: Examining the Role of the 1981 United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief.” BYU L. Rev. 217 1(2): 217–36.
Davis, W. (1992). Japanese Religion and Society: Paradigms of Structure and Change. Suny Press.
Declaration on the rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities. (1994). Refugee Survey Quarterly, 13(4), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/13.4.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/13.4.62
Dickson, B. (1995). “The United Nations and Freedom of Religion.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 44(2): 327–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/760754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/44.2.327
Doe, N. (2017). “Towards a ‘Common Law’on Religion in the European Union.” In Law and Religion, An Overview, Routledge, 221–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091990-11
Eisgruber, C. L., and Sager, L. G. (2007). Religious Freedom and the Constitution. Harvard University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjhzsb5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674034457
Ekhator, E. O. (2015). “The Impact of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on Domestic Law: A Case Study of Nigeria.” Commonwealth Law Bulletin 41(2): 253–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2015.1049633
Fink, C. (1995). “The League of Nations and the Minorities Question.” World Affairs 157(4): 197–205. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20672435.
Fox, G. (2015). “The United Nations Forum on Minority Issues and Its Role in Promoting the Un Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities.” In The United Nations Declaration on Minorities, Brill Nijhoff, 87–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251564_006
Gunn, T. J. (2004). “Religious Freedom and Laïcité: A Comparison of the United States and France.” BYU L. Rev.: 419.
Hardacre, H. (1989). 1 Shinto and the State, 1868-1988. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691221298
Hooker, K (2018) “Church and State in Elizabethan England.”
Kaveny, C. (2016). A Culture of Engagement: Law, Religion, and Morality. Georgetown University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book45076
Kuru, A. T. (2009). Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815096
Lenaghan, P. M. (2010). “The Right to Freedom of Religion in the Public Domain in South Africa.”
Lerner, H. (2013). “Permissive Constitutions, Democracy, and Religious Freedom in India, Indonesia, Israel, and Turkey.” World Politics 65(4): 609–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42002225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887113000208
Lindkvist, L. (2013). “The Politics of Article 18: Religious Liberty in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 4(3): 429–47. doi:10.1353/hum.2013.0023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2013.0023
Morsink, J. (1999). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhrpm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200416
Neuwahl, N. A, and Rosas, A. (2021). 42 The European Union and Human Rights. BRILL.
O’Flaherty, M. (2012). “Freedom of Expression: Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Human Rights Committee’s General Comment No 34.” Human Rights Law Review 12(4): 627–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs030
Perry, M. J. (2004a). “A Right to Religious Freedom-The Universality of Human Rights, the Relativity of Culture.” Roger Williams UL Rev. 10: 385.
Perry, M. J. (2004b). “A Right to Religious Freedom-The Universality of Human Rights, the Relativity of Culture.” Roger Williams UL Rev. 10: 385.
Peterson, M. D., Vaughan, R. C. (1988). 1 The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom: Its Evolution and Consequences in American History. Cambridge University Press.
Scolnicov, A. (2010). Routledge The Right to Religious Freedom in International Law: Between Group Rights and Individual Rights. First. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842638
Shelton, D. (2003). “The Boundaries of Human Rights Jurisdiction in Europe.” Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 13: 95.
Su, Anna. 2016. Exporting Freedom: Religious Liberty and American Power. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674495050
Thomas, S. M. (2010). “A Globalized God: Religion’s Growing Influence in International Politics.” Foreign Affairs 89(6): 93–101. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20788720.
Topidi, K. (2021). “Religious Minority Identity in the Work of the Advisory Committee of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities: A Multifaceted Challenge in Evolution.” Religions 12(10): 858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100858
Vanderbeck, R. M, and Johnson, P. (2016). “The Promotion of British Values: Sexual Orientation Equality, Religion, and England’s Schools.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 30(3): 292–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebw012
Vierdag, E. W. (1978). “The Legal Nature of the Rights Granted by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Netherlands yearbook of international law 9: 69–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0167676800003780
Wazynska-Finck, K., and Finck, F. (2013). “The Right to Change One’s Religion According to Article 18 of ICCPR and the Universality of Human Rights.” J. Islamic St. Prac. Int’l L. 9: 36.
Yamagishi, K. (2017). “Freedom of Religion, Religious Political Participation, and Separation of Religion and State: Legal Considerations from Japan.” In Law and Religion, An Overview, Routledge, 453–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091990-21
Yupsanis, A. (2013). “Article 27 of the ICCPR Revisited–The Right to Culture as a Normative Source for Minority/Indigenous Participatory Claims in the Case Law of the Human Rights Committee.” In Hague Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire de La Haye de Droit International, Vol. 26 (2013), Brill Nijhoff, 359–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004287365_013
Published on: 07-10-2024
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Anas Jameel, Dr. Waseem Ahmed, Dr. Md. Altamash Imam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.