The Political Economy of Green Transitions: Financing Climate Action in the Global South
Keywords:
Climate Finance, Global South, Political Economy, Just Transition, Debt-Climate Nexus, Green BondsAbstract
This study examines the political economy of financing green transitions in the Global South, analyzing structural barriers, geopolitical constraints, and market-driven limitations that hinder equitable climate finance flows. The main research objectives focus on assessing how political and economic structures shape green financing accessibility, and identifying policy solutions to enhance climate investment effectiveness. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the study combines dependency theory, world-systems theory, and green political economy frameworks with comparative case studies from Brazil, Kenya, India, and Indonesia. Data was gathered through policy analysis, expert interviews, and financial flow assessments. Key findings reveal persistent North-South disparities, with only 14% of multilateral climate funds reaching Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Market mechanisms prioritize profitable mitigation projects over adaptation, while debt-climate traps force vulnerable nations to divert resources from resilience-building. Case studies highlight contradictions, such as Kenya’s pioneering green bonds failing to address rural energy poverty, and India’s clean energy fund coexisting with coal expansion. The research contributes to climate justice debates by exposing how existing finance architectures reproduce inequality. It proposes six evidence-based recommendations, including democratizing climate governance and mandating 30% private finance allocation to adaptation. The study concludes that systemic reforms not incremental changes are needed to align financial flows with just transition principles.
Downloads
References
Amin, S. (1976). Unequal development: An essay on the social formations of peripheral capitalism. Monthly Review Press.
Ayeb-Karlsson, S., Kniveton, D., & Cannon, T. (2016). Trapped in the prison of the past: Bangladeshi climate migrants' adaptation trap. Forced Migration Review, 51, 20–22.
Barreto, P., Pereira, R., & Arima, E. (2019). Deforestation dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon: Land-use pressures and political economy. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124017.
Bazilian, M., Nussbaumer, P., & Brew-Hammond, A. (2019). Off-grid solar energy and sustainable development in Kenya. Energy for Sustainable Development, 51, 1–9.
Bird, N., Watson, C., & Schalatek, L. (2012). The global climate finance architecture. Overseas Development Institute.
Bracking, S. (2019). Financialisation, climate finance, and the calculative challenges of managing environmental change. Antipode, 51(3), 709–729.
Buchner, B., Clark, A., Falconer, A., Macquarie, R., Meattle, C., Tolentino, R., & Wetherbee, C. (2019). Global landscape of climate finance 2019. Climate Policy Initiative.
Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 121, 220–230.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press.
Chase-Dunn, C. (1989). Global formation: Structures of the world-economy. Blackwell.
Clapp, C., Ellis, J., Benn, J., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2012). Tracking climate finance: What and how? OECD Publishing.
Clapp, J., & Isakson, S. R. (2018). Risky returns: The implications of financialization in the food system. Development and Change, 49(2), 437–460.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2020). Kenya’s green bond: A milestone for Africa. Climate Bonds Initiative.
Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., & Khan, M. (2015). Power in a warming world: The new global politics of climate change and the remaking of environmental inequality. MIT Press.
Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
Dubash, N. K., & Rajan, S. C. (2020). India’s clean energy fund: Achievements and challenges. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(11), 30–37.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. Monthly Review Press.
Frank, A. G. (1967). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17–31.
Furtado, C. (1970). Economic development of Latin America: Historical background and contemporary problems. Cambridge University Press.
GCF. (2021). Simplified approval process pilot scheme: Progress report. Green Climate Fund.
Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M. E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society. Duke University Press.
ICLEI. (2015). Financing the resilient city: A demand-driven approach to development, disaster risk reduction, and climate adaptation. ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability.
IRENA. (2020). Renewable energy market analysis: Africa and its regions. International Renewable Energy Agency.
Kallis, G. (2018). Degrowth. Agenda Publishing.
Mazzucato, M., & Semieniuk, G. (2018). Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 8–22.
Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2018). The politics of technology bans: Industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry. Review of International Political Economy, 25(6), 790–814.
Mol, A. P., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–49.
Mulyana, A., Nasrudin, R., & Sari, D. P. (2020). Towards a just transition in Indonesia: Balancing climate action and social equity. Energy Research & Social Science, 67, 101533.
Nakhooda, S., Watson, C., & Schalatek, L. (2016). Climate finance thematic briefing: Climate finance funds and institutions. Overseas Development Institute.
Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013). The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 132–140.
OECD. (2022). Aligning development co-operation and climate action: The only way forward. OECD Publishing.
Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations.
Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. MIT Press.
Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2009). Ecologically unequal exchange, ecological debt, and climate justice: The history and implications of three related ideas for a new social movement. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50(3–4), 385–409.
Roberts, J. T., & Weikmans, R. (2017). Postface: Fragmentation, failing trust, and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 129–137.
Sari, R. F., Nugroho, B., & Santoso, H. (2021). Coal dependency and energy transition challenges in Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125039.
Sharma, A. (2018). International climate finance and India’s renewable energy ambitions. Climate Policy, 18(8), 1001–1014.
Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: Vulnerability and protection. Oxford University Press.
Toye, J., & Toye, R. (2003). The UN and global political economy: Trade, finance, and development. Indiana University Press.
UNDP. (2019). Strengthening institutional capacities for climate finance. United Nations Development Programme.
UNFCCC. (2020). Introduction to climate finance. https://unfccc.int/topics/climate-finance
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. Academic Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.
Weikmans, R., & Roberts, J. T. (2019). The international climate finance accounting muddle: Is there hope on the horizon? Climate and Development, 11(2), 97–111.
Weikmans, R., Roberts, J. T., Baum, J. K., et al. (2017). Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation finance is reported. Climatic Change, 144(2), 257–272.
Published on: 20-09-2025
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammed Kabeer Garba, Jibrin Hussaini Abubakar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
