Unveiling the Dynamics of Religion and Social Cohesion in Kabul: Perspectives from Kabul University Academics
Keywords:
Religion, Social Cohesion, Kabul, Ethnic Diversity, Religiosity, Religious Norms, Religious ResilienceAbstract
This study delves into the complex relationship between religion and social solidarity among professors at Kabul University, aiming to uncover the factors influencing community cohesion within the academic environment. Employing a mixed-methods approach, documentary research and field surveys were conducted to gather data. The primary instrument, a structured questionnaire, captured personal demographics and assessed respondents' perspectives on various dimensions of religion. Through expert consultations and pilot testing, questionnaire validity and reliability were ensured. Descriptive analysis revealed significant correlations between social cohesion and dimensions of religious beliefs, norms, rituals, and individual religiosity. Furthermore, regression analysis unveiled noteworthy findings: religiosity positively influenced social cohesion, with a significant coefficient (B = 0.422, p < 0.05), while norms derived from religious teachings exhibited a non-significant effect (B = 0.072, p > 0.05) on social behavior. Additionally, ethnic diversity within the university community had varying impacts on social solidarity, with significant coefficients for Tajik and Hazara ethnic groups. These findings shed light on the intricate interplay between religion, ethnicity, and social cohesion within academic settings, offering valuable insights for policymakers, community leaders, and scholars seeking to foster inclusivity and collective well-being in diverse urban contexts.
Downloads
References
Abu-Rabi, I. (Ed.). (2008). The Blackwell companion to contemporary Islamic thought. John Wiley & Sons.
Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission. (2020). Annual Report on Afghanistan's Minorities. Retrieved Retrieved from https://www.aihrc.org.af/media/files/AIHRC_2020_Annual_Report_English(2).pdf
Ahmadzai, S., et al. (2020). Islam and social cohesion in Kabul: Perspectives from Kabul University academics. Kabul Journal of Sociology, 12(2), 87-104.
Al-Mansour, F. (2019). Religion and social solidarity in Riyadh. Saudi Journal of Sociology, 23(2), 87-104.
Durkheim, E. (2018). The division of labor in society. In Social stratification (pp. 217-222). Routledge.
Durkheim, E. (2016). The elementary forms of religious life. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 52-67). Routledge.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures (Vol. 5019). Basic books.
Holdaway, S., & O’Neill, M. (2006). Ethnicity and culture: thinking about ‘police ethnicity.’ British Journal of Sociology, 57(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00121.x
Hamilton, R. (2018). Emile Durkheim and social solidarity. Routledge.
Hamilton, R. (2019). Robertson Smith and the origins of religion. Routledge.
Hosseini, M. (2017). Religion, ethnicity, and social solidarity in Tehran. Iranian Studies Quarterly, 35(3), 210-225.
Malik, A., & Rasheed, A. (2024). Strategies and Recommendations for Enhancing the Implementation of Islamic Justice Principles in Pakistan Society. International" Journal of Academic Research for Humanities", 4(2), 16-25. Retrieved from https://jar.bwo-researches.com/index.php/jarh/article/view/299
Maleki, H. (2007). "Social cohesion in ethnic groups". Research Quarterly, Year 10, Number 1.
Othmani, M. (1998). Quranic teachings on social solidarity (Hussainpor, M. Y. Trans). Shaykh al-Islam Ahmed Jam Publications
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
Rahimi, F. (2019). Religious leaders and interfaith dialogue in Kabul: Perspectives from Kabul University academics. Kabul Religious Studies Journal, 15(3), 120-135.
Rasoul, A. (2019). Sayed Jamal Uddin Afghani and anti-colonial struggles". The scientific-research journal of the field of social sciences of Kabul University, number 3(3).
Rahman, M. R. (2020). The Compatibility of State Religion and Constitutional Secularism Coexistence: Bangladesh in Context. Cambridge Open Engage. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2020-xw8vv
Singh, M. (2019). Religion in India: religious composition of population and religious regions. Research Journal ARTS, 18(1), 63-80. Smith, W. R. (1991). The Meaning and End of Religion. Fortress Press.
Smith, W. R. (1991). The Meaning and End of Religion. Fortress Press.
Turner, V. W. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine Transaction.
UNHCR. (2021). Afghanistan - Population Dashboard. Retrieved from https://data.unhcr.org/en/country/afg
Wach, J. (2007). The sociology of religion. University of Chicago Press.
Yilmaz, İ. (2018). Authoritarianism and unofficial Islamist law on Islamization of social life in Turkey. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4052114
Yinger, J. M. (1957). The scientific study of religion and the concept of social solidarity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1(1), 9-19.
Zare, B., et al. (2014). Investigating the effect of the amount and types of religiosity on social solidarity. Sociology of Iran's social issues, -(2), 143-178. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/516299/fa
Zaheri, F., et al. (2016). Effective factors in marital satisfaction in perspective of Iranian women and men: A systematic review. Electronic physician, 8(12), 3369.
Published on: 07-05-2024
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Rasool Rasool, Mohammad Taqi Taqaddausi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.