[ Gold Award ]
JOVELYN M. CANTINA
Article ID: sjahss-1-11-3-15-23
Read more»
INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AS THE BASIS OF EDUCATIONAL SPACE
Keywords:
education, culture, dialogue, discourseAbstract
The article is based on the idea that all the various external manifestations of the spiritual essence of a person are complicated by the lack of development of target objects, principles, and potential of cultural-educational and pedagogical means of harmonizing the interaction of people. The first place in it is asserting the dialogic style of life of the subjects involved in the cultural and educational space. The analysis of intercultural education as a social institution and sociocultural space for an individual’s socialization has made it possible to suggest that it has the potential to ensure the spiritual security of Ukrainian society, particularly regarding intercultural relations. The authors conclude that dialogue cooperation, as a certain humanitarian technology, should direct all educational discourses into the development of a dialogue of cultures and its orientation towards philosophical reflection in the educational process. Philosophical reflection approximates the notion of “intercultural dialogue” and other terms and even categories that function in scientific and academic life. The article stresses that communication space is often contradictory to determine at least the meaning of these concepts and release them from stereotyped connotations, falsifications and quasi-intellectual layers.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abuzhenko V.L. (2003). Understanding / The New Philosophical Dictionary: 3rd ed., Corrected. Mn.: Book House, 1280 pp. (World of Encyclopedias). P. 767-769., P. 767.
Bakhtin, M. (1979). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. M .: Art, 424 p.
Bakhtin M.M. (1990). Problems of Dostoevsky’s creativity // Makhlin V.L. Mikhail Bakhtin: The Philosophy of the Deed. M .: Politizdat. P.49 -54.
Borodina T.V. Social dialogue: communicative strategies for the personal representation of social relations. - Electronic resource: http://cheloveknauka.com/sotsiialnyy-dialog-kommunikativnye-strategii-lichnostnoy-reprezentatsii-obschestvennyh-otnosheniy#ixzz3ZHassy/
Bulatov M.O. (2009). Philosophical Dictionary. K .: Stilos, P. 522.
Dialogue / Head Guides. Ed. I. Belov / Translation by D. Viren, A. Davtyan, V. Okun. Copyright by the Foundation “Borderland”, Seyne, 2015. P. 559-567.
Contemporary global transformations and the problem of historical self-determination of the East Slavic peoples / Ch. S. Kirvel [and others]; ed. Dr. Philosoph. Sciences, prof. Ch.S. Kirvel. 3rd ed., Minsk: Four quarters, 2010. P.544-545.
Dobrenkova, E.V. (2007). Social morphology of educational discourse: theoretical, methodological analysis: author’s abstract. diss ... doc. sociologist sciences. Rostov-on-Don, P. 14.
Habermas J. (1985). Ruckkehr zur Metaphysik. Eine Tendenz in der deutschen Philosophie? In: Merkur, H.439/440, 898 p.
Habermas J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handels / J. Habermas. Bd.2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 348 p.
Hosle V. (2006). Der Philosophical Dialogue Eine Poetik und Hermeneutit / V. Hosle. Munchen, Verlag C.H.BeckoHg, 494 p.
Guattari F. (1998). What is philosophy? = Qu'est-ce que la philosophie? [Tr. from Fr. by S.N. Zenkina] / Guattari F., Deleuze J. M .: Int. Exper. sociology; SPb .: Aleteey, 260 p.
Kendzor P.I. (2016). Integration through dialogue. The system of organizing multicultural education at school: [monograph]. Lviv: Publishing House “Panorama”, 378 p.
Koran (by I. Yu. Krachkovsky). Dushanbe, 1990. 443 p.
Kozhemyakin E.A., Krotkov E.A. (2008). Methodological problems of the study of discourse practices // Journal of the Institute of System Analysis, No. 37. P. 67-72.
Krotkov E.A., Nosova T.V. (2009). The nature of the philosophical (metaphysical) discourse // Epistemology and the philosophy of science. No. 3. P. 37.
Modern philosophy: Dictionary and textbook. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 1997. P. 148.
Philosophy / Sub. Ed. A.F. Zotov, V.V. Mironov, A.V.Razina. 6 ed., M .: Academic Design, 2009. P.520.
Proleev S. (2014). “Society of knowledge” as an anthropological situation // Philosophy of Education. No. 1 (14). P. 7-24., P. 7-8.
Radionova N.V. (2008). Representation of philosophy in the educational space of Slobozhanschina in the nineteenth century. Sumy: OJSC “SOD”, publishing house “Kozatsky val”, 320 p.
Schmitt H. (1998). Beauftragter der Stadt Mannheim für ausländische Einwohner // Abschlußbericht: JUST Modellprojekt für interkulturelle Jugendarbeit. Mannheim, P. 43.
Schweizer, A. (1992). Awakening to life. M.: Progress, 258p.
Published on: 31-07-2022
Also Available On
Note: Third-party indexing sometime takes time. Please wait one week or two for indexing. Validate this article's Schema Markup on Schema.org
How to Cite
Garmash, O., Barantsova, I., & Rutkovsky, M. (2022). INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AS THE BASIS OF EDUCATIONAL SPACE. Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(07), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v1i07.39
Issue
Section
Research Article
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Olena Garmash, Irina Barantsova, Maxim Rutkovsky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
