Effect of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) on Science Teachers’ Instructional and Assessment Practices
Keywords:
Professional learning communities, assessment practices, instructional practices, professional practices, science teachersAbstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) on science teachers’ instructional practices and assessment practices. Based on the pragmatist’s paradigm and mixed methods approach, the study used the Convergent parallel mixed methods design. Professional Learning communities (PLC) and Instructional and Assessment Practices Questionnaire (PLCIAQ) were used to collect data. The sample consisted of 17 in-service science teachers who participated in weekly PLC sessions in their schools for two years. The sample was purposively selected to include only science teachers. It was found that most of the teachers (76.5%) stated that PLCs positively affected their instructional practices. PLCs have a moderate effect on science teachers’ instructional practices (M = 3.71, SD = 0.92). It was found that PLCs have more effect on science teachers’ instructional practices (M = 3.94, SD = 1.03) followed by their classroom management practices (M = 3.88, SD = 1.27), student grouping practices (M = 3.82, SD = 1.13), science content taught (M = 3.71, SD = 1.26), teaching materials (M = 3.65, SD = 1.37), teaching methods (M = 3.65, SD = 1.41). It was also revealed that most of the science teachers (88.2%) think that PLCs positively affected their assessment practices. PLCs have a moderate effect on science teachers’ assessment practices (M = 3.73, SD = 0.71). It was found that PLC has influenced more on summative assessment (M = 3.94, SD = 0.75), followed by formative assessment (M = 3.82, SD = 1.07), and the kinds of questions asked (M = 3.71, SD = 1.05). Also, PLCs least affected frequency of assessments (M = 3.65, SD = 0.86) and assessments by collaborative teams (M = 3.41, SD = 1.12). Paired samples t-test revealed no statistically significant difference in science teachers’ instructional practices (M = 3.71, SD = .92) and their assessment practices (M = 3.74, SD = .71), t (16) = -.629, p = .791. However, Pearson’s correlation reveals a significant high correlation between science teachers’ instructional and assessment practices (r = .851, p = 0.000).
Downloads
References
Amua-Sekyi, E. T. (2016). Assessment, Student Learning and Classroom Practice: A Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 1–6.
Barton, R., & Stepanek, J. (2012). The Impact of Professional Learning Communities. Principal’s Research Review, 7(4).
Betts, D. G. (2012). The Role of Professional Learning Communities in Developing and Using Common Formative Assessments. Dissertations. 329. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/329%0AThis
Black, P. (2017). Assessment in Science Education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education (pp. 295–296). Sense Publishers.
Blonder, R., & Vescio, V. (2022). Professional Learning Communities Across Science Teachers’ Careers: The Importance of Differentiating Learning. In Handbook of Research on Science Teacher Education (1st ed., Issue September). Routledge.
Bolam, R., Mcmahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities. DfES Publications.
Bond, J. K. (2019). Effects of Professional Learning Communities on Instructional Revisions in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms. Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1219. https://doi.org/https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1219
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dampson, D. G. (2021). Effectiveness of Professional Learning Communities in Ghanaian Basic Schools through the Lenses of Socio-Cultural Theory. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(2), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v7i2.19114
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
Doğan, S., Adams, A., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: A review, Professional Development in Education, 41, pp. 569-588. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899
Dogan, S., Tatık, R. Ş., & Yurtseven, N. (2017). Professional Learning Communities Assessment: Adaptation, Internal Validity, and Multidimensional Model Testing in Turkish Context. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(4), 1203–1229. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.4.0479
DuFour, R. & Marzano, R. J. (2011). Leaders of learning: How districts, school, and classroom leaders, improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
DuFour, R. (2002). The learning centered principal. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 12-15.
DuFour, R. (2004). Leading edge: The best staff development is in the workplace, not in a workshop. Journal of Staff Development, 25(2).
DuFour, R. (2007). Professional learning communities. A bandwagon, an idea worth considering, or our best hope for high levels of learning: Middle School Journal, http://www.amle.org/Publications?middleSchoolJournal
DuFour, R. (2007). Professional learning communities. A bandwagon, an idea worth considering, or our best hope for high levels of learning: Middle School Journal, http://www.amle.org/Publications?middleSchoolJournal
DuFour, R., DuFour, R. Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2010). Learning by doing (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Edwards, F. (2013). Quality assessment by science teachers: Five focus areas. Science Education International, 24(2), 212–226.
Fullan, M. (2006). Leading professional learning. School Administrator, 63(10), 10-14.
Fulton, K., & Britton, T. (2011). STEM Teachers in Professional Learning Communities: From Good Teachers to Great Teaching. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, June.
Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, H. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, pp. 124-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010068703786
Grammatikopoulos, V., Tsigilis, N., & Gregoriadis, A. (2019). Assessing the Science Learning Assessment (SLA) Instrument in Greek Early Childhood Education Using the Item Response Theory Framework. Frontiers in Education, 4(123), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00123
Guskey, T. (2007). Using assessments to improve teaching and learning. In D. Reeves (Ed.), Ahead of the curve: The power of assessments to transform teaching and learning. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree (formerly National Educational Service).
Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher 15(5), 5-12.
Hamos, J. E., Bergin, K. B., Maki, D. P., Perez, L. C., Prival, J. T., Rainey, D. Y., Rowell, G. H., & Vanderputten, E. (2009). Opening the Classroom Door: Professional Learning Communities in the Math and Science Partnership Program. Science Educator, 18(2), 14–24.
Harlen, W. (2007) Assessment of Learning. London: Sage.
Harlen, W. (2013). Assessment & Inquiry-Based Science Education: Issues in Policy and Practice. Global Network of Science Academies (IAP) Science Education Programme (SEP).
Harrison, C. (2015). Assessment for Learning in Science Classrooms. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(2), 78–86.
Hayden, E. D. (2022). Professional Learning Communities: Perception of Impact on Learning. Online Theses and Dissertations. 727.
Hodgson, C., & Pyle, K. (2010). A literature review of Assessment for Learning in science. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.
Kruse, S. D., & Louis, K. S. (1993, April). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Kruse, S. D., & Louis, K. S. (1995). Developing professional community in new and restructuring urban schools. In K. S. Louis, S. D. Kruse & Associates (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 187–209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Marks, H. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
M.O.E. (2018). National Pre-Tertiary Education Curriculum Framework National Pre-Tertiary Education Curriculum Framework for Developing Subject Curricula. Ministry of Education Republic of Ghana.
Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Murphy-Latta, T. (2008). A comparative study of professional development utilizing the Missouri commissioner’s Award of Excellence and indicators of student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (3297825).
Pan, H. W., & Cheng, S. (2023). Examining the Impact of Teacher Learning Communities on Self-Efficacy and Professional Learning: An Application of the Theory-Driven Evaluation. Sustainability, 15(4771). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1506477
Panizzon, D. (2020). Assessment, Learning and Teaching: A Symbiotic Relationship. In V. Dawson, G. Venville, & J. Donovan (Eds.), The Art of Teaching Science (3rd ed., pp. 140–158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117896-11
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2007). Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Peda- gogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Educa- tion, 38(3), 261–284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2019). The Effects of Networked Professional Learning Communities. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117753574
Samaie, M., & Valizadeh, P. (2023). The gap between teaching, assessment, and learning: EFL teachers’ perceptions and strategies. Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal, 7, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltf.2023.07.02
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday
Stoll, L. & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 24, 24, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Wood, D. (2007). Teachers learning communities: Catalyst for change or a new infrastructure for the status quo. Teachers College Record 109(3), 699-739.
Published on: 03-02-2025
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Philip Dorsah, Alberta Ayilimba, Thomas Nipielim Tindan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
