ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT RETENTION STRATEGIES AT ZIMBABWE OPEN UNIVERSITY
Keywords:
Student retention, Student retention strategies, Open UniversityAbstract
The study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of the student retention strategies at the Zimbabwe Open University. It utilised the qualitative approach to collect and analyse data. The data was collected through interviews. The study sample comprised sixteen participants, eight staff members and eight students. These were selected through purposive sampling since the study was qualitative. The findings show that ZOU had very lucrative strategies to manage student retention. Among them were management and leadership styles, peer teaching, mentoring and collaboration, orientation, and student-centred active learning. It also noted that ZOU had challenges in student retention which included resources, social influences, soft skills and teaching methods. The study concluded challenges faced by students were basically situational not institute based. Teaching methods like peer tutoring and collaboration were important as they created a conducive environment for learning. The study recommended that ZOU continuously trains its front desk employees and equip them with correct information. It was also recommended that the students be made aware of the learning styles in an ODL setup before taking up the studies.
Downloads
References
ACT (2010). What works in student retention? ACT, Iowa City,
Iowa. http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/reports/retain.html.
American Association of Community Colleges. (2012, April). Reclaiming the American Dream: A report from the 21st-Century Commission on the Future of Community Colleges. Washington, DC: Author.
Bennis, W. (1994). On becoming a leader. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Bryson, C. & Hand, L. (2007). 'The Role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning, https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 44 (4) pp. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, unpublished tables, 2012.
Chakuchichi, D. (2011). Student retention as a function of the quality of learner support in open and distance learning: Students' perceptions at the Zimbabwe Open University. Zimbabwe. International Journal of Open & Distance Learning, 1(1), 90-98.
Cohen, H. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge Publishers Limited.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Crosling, G, Heagney, M. & Thomas, L. (2009). Improving student retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning, Australian Universities Review, 51(2), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935453
Engelkemeyer, S. W. (1998). Applying Benchmarking in Higher Education: A Review of Three case Studies. Quality Management Journal, 5(4), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1998.11919165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1998.11919165
Feldman, K. & Newcomb, T. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heavy R. I. & DeCelles, R. (2002). Family education Model: Meeting the student retention challenge. Journal of American Indian Education, 8(5), 34-39.
Horstmanshof, L. & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(15), 703-718. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X160778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X160778
Jones, R. (2008). Widening participation -student retention and success: Research synthesis for the Higher Education Academy. New York: Sage Publications.
Krause, K. & Coates, H. (2008). Students' engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892
Kuh, G. D. & Siegel, M. J. (2000). College student experiences questionnaire: Tentative norms for the fourth edition. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, Bloomington, IN.
Kurfiss J. G. (1988). Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1988.
Latifah, A. (2007). (2007, October). Retention initiatives at Open University Malaysia: Past, present and future. Paper presented at 21st Annual AAOU Conference, Putrajaya.
Lawrence, J. (2005). Re-Conceptualising Attrition and Retention: Integrating Theoretical Research and Student perspective. Studies in Learning Evaluation, innovation, and Development, 4(3), 11-33.
Noel-Levitz. (2008). Student success, retention, and graduation: Definitions, theories, practices, patterns, and trends. Coralville, IA: Noel-Levitz.
Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive Perspectives of the top ten soft skills needed in today workplace. New York: Sage Publishers.
Scott, G., Shah, M., Grebennikov, L., & Singh, H. (2008). Improving student retention: A University of Western Sydney Case Study. AAIR Journal, 14(1), 37-41
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd Ed). Chicago. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922461.001.0001
Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: what next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research Theory and Practice, 8(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W
Topping, K. J. & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer Assisted Learning: A Framework for Consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(7), 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03
White, E. J., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H. & Kuh, G. D. (2012). Assessing conditions to enhance student success. About Campus. July-August. Wiley Inter-Science, www.interscience.wiley.com
Published on: 2022-01-11
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jura Florence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
