Performance Management and its Impact on Public Sectors’ Effectiveness (a Study in Afghanistan)
Keywords:
performance, performance management, effectiveness, impact, public sectorAbstract
The main purpose of this study is to clarify the impact of performance management in the public sector. Public sectors are the core entities in a country that play vital roles in order to provide services to the public and bring comfort to them. Therefore, it is important to understand whether public sectors can be effective for the general public or not. In order for the public sector to be effective performance management must be put in place. As Afghanistan is a country with high bureaucracy in its public sectors, therefore, there was a need for research to be conducted in the field of Performance management to find out the factors which lead to weak performance in the public sectors. The result of the study shows that some factors like favoritism, conflict of interest, and appointing inexperienced employees with irrelevant educational backgrounds to operational and managerial positions can lead to weak performance in public sectors.
Downloads
References
Andrews, R. (2014). Performance Management and Public Service Improvement.
Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management Key Strategies and Guidelines. USA: Kogan Page Limited.
Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management; Key strategies and practical guidelines.
Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management Key Strategies and Practical Gudelines.
Barone, A. (2022, 03 23). Quality Management. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/q/quality-management.asp
Botswana. (2003). National Development Plan 9. Republic of Botswana, Ministry of Finance and Development Planning.
Dooren, W. V., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance Management in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203030806
Kearney, R. C., & Berman, E. M. (2018). Public Sector Performance Management, Motivation, and Measurement. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497964
Lathman. (2007). Sampling Techniques. NewYork.
Macavoy, P. W., Stanbury, W., Yarrow, G., & Zekhauzer, R. J. (1989). Privatization and State-owned Enterprises. Massachusetts : Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7429-9
Mounivang, K. (2018). 3 Workflow Barriers to Effective Performance Management.
Performance Management Process. (1907). State of Oklahoma.
(2009). PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE. S T A T E O F W A S H I N G T O N: OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Rashid, F. R. (2021). Performance Management in the Public Sector of Brunei Darussalam.
Santos, M. (2021). Performance Management, A new Strategy for Improving Public Sector's Effectiveness.
Stanciu, A.-C., Constandache, M., & Condrea, E. (2013). Concerns about the Sustainable Performance of Firm in the Context of Quality Management Systems Implementation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.127
Published on: 2023-04-05
Also Available On
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Farid Ahmad Azizi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to this journal retain the copyright of their articles but agree to publish their articles under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially, under the condition that appropriate credit is given, that a link to the license is provided, and that they indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
